Dr. Praeger's Classic Chick'n Tenders

Dr. Praeger’s

Flavor:

Ingredients:

Texturized Pea Protein (Water, Pea Protein, Pea Fiber, Sunflower Oil, Potato Starch), Rice Coating (Rice Flour, Whole Grain Amaranth Flour, Corn Starch, Raisin Juice Concentrate, Salt, Dextrose, Garlic Powder, Onion Powder, Yeast extract, Spice), Water, High Oleic Sunflower Oil, Sweet Potato Puree, Butternut Squash Puree, Carrot Puree, Methyl Cellulose, Natural Flavors, Potato Starch

Rating:     Average

Ingredient Score:

Rated at 3 out of 5 green leaves, Dr. Praeger’s Classic Chick’n Tenders occupies a middle ground on the cleaner food spectrum. This product does not claim to be organic, positioning it behind those that do in terms of clean eating standards. However, it is made with non-GMO ingredients, which aligns with the preferences of health-conscious consumers.

The inclusion of texturized pea protein as the base of the tenders reflects a trend towards plant-based eating. The use of sunflower oil, sweet potato, butternut squash, and carrot purees adds to the nutritional profile, offering a blend of vegetables within the product. The coating, which includes rice and amaranth flours, provides an alternative to traditional wheat flour, catering to those with gluten sensitivities or preferences.

On the downside, deductions were made due to the presence of dextrose, a type of added sugar that detracts from the product’s healthfulness. Additionally, the term ‘natural flavors’ on the label raises questions, as this vague descriptor often encompasses a range of substances that may not align with cleaner food principles. Corn starch, while not uncommon in processed foods, also contributed to the reduction in score, as it is often perceived as a less desirable ingredient by those seeking whole food options.

Dr. Praeger’s Classic Chick’n Tenders thus presents a balance of positive and negative attributes. It offers a plant-based alternative to chicken, incorporates a variety of vegetables, and avoids GMOs. However, its non-organic status, the use of added sugars, and questionable additives prevent it from achieving a higher rating. Consumers seeking cleaner, more natural food products may find this to be an acceptable option, though it falls short of the highest standards set within the clean eating community.

Certifications:

Product formulations and certifications may change. For current nutrition facts and ingredient
line information, check product packaging.

Categories:

Alternatives

No Items found.

Get the dirt on clean eating

Stay in the know with the latest ratings, articles, and our newsletter, The Dirt.