Venom Energy

Flavor:

Mango

Ingredients:

Carbonated Water, Corn syrup, Glucose, Citric Acid, Maltodextrin, Taurine, Sodium Citrate, L-cartine, Inositol, Caffeine, Sodium benzoate (Preservative), Potassium Sorbate (Preservative), Niacinamide (Vitamin B3), Natural Flavors, Sucralose, Ginseng Extract, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6), Guarana Extract, Caramel Color, Riboflavin (Vitamin B2), Yellow #6, Yellow #5, Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12).

Rating: We Avoid

Ingredient Score:

Rated at 1/5 green leaves, the Venom Energy Mango drink fails to meet the criteria for cleaner food options due to its composition of ingredients. The product is not organic and contains GMOs, factors that contribute to its low rating. Furthermore, the presence of added sugars, such as citric acid, glucose, and corn syrup, combined with artificial sweeteners like sucralose, significantly diminishes its standing.

The drink also includes a variety of additives that raise concerns. Among these are natural flavors and sodium citrate, which, despite their innocuous names, often raise questions regarding their origins and potential health impacts. The inclusion of preservatives such as potassium sorbate and sodium benzoate, alongside colorants like caramel color, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6, adds to the list of undesirable components.

It is worth noting that the product contains a blend of vitamins and stimulants, with ingredients like niacinamide, pyridoxine hydrochloride, and cyanocobalamin contributing to its vitamin content, and caffeine, ginseng extract, and guarana extract providing an energy boost. However, these potentially beneficial elements are overshadowed by the drink’s overall composition, which is heavily weighted by ingredients considered detrimental to health.

The assessment of the Venom Energy Mango drink reflects a strict adherence to a standard that prioritizes organic, non-GMO, and additive-free products. The drink’s formulation, laden with artificial substances and sweeteners, positions it at odds with the values of those seeking cleaner dietary choices. Its low rating serves as a directive to consumers to steer clear of this product in favor of healthier alternatives that align more closely with a clean eating philosophy.